new uptrend was just started since March. tracking 60yr cycle is meaningless cuz it has been inaccurate for two years. Like you said, the market speaks itself and it is always right. You cant just find the excuses to change the date like 5/10,5/21,7/4 if the top is not formed. You should find a new method instead of a new excuse. What u gotta say if the market keep going up after your final date 7/4? Find another date and reason?this is what u have been done in past two yrs,this is not right. You making a big directional mistake and u don’t wanna revise. People subscribed u because they wanna learn from you,or earn some money based on your predictions.but u keep going wrong for two years without any revision.people can either learn nothing from your wrong method or go bankrupt from your prediction. Things become meaningless. You don’t need to reply cuz I ain’t read your post any more. U need to wake up.dont trap yourself in a same mistake cycle. That mistake cycle is the real cycle for u.
David, I do not have a crystal ball, and over the past 5-years I have always been clear, the market may not always follow the 60-year cycle. It is an important cycle, it does not mean the cycle can not contract, extend or invert. I showed you in March in this post: https://fiorente2.substack.com/p/a-revisit-to-recent-charts-and-analysis on the "DJIA -Monthly Chart - The 60-year cycle long-term forecast chart" how this cycle behaved since 2009. It showed a long-term uptrend and then a more sideways move for a decade or more. It has been very accurate in 2022, and other time you see inversions to occur for some time, but the overall trend kept intact for over 16 years. Recently (April 19) in this post: https://fiorente2.substack.com/p/new-highs-and-the-jupiter-saturn I showed you that the Jupiter-Saturn cycle, roughly 1/3 of the 60-year cycle was expected to have a high mid-2026, and I also posted in chart 4 the probabilities of the DJIA aligning with the 6 Jupiter-Saturn cycles over the last 120 years. The only period that shows inversions is between 1966 and 1986, probably caused by retrograde periods of longer-term cycles. So, we may have entered such a period, in which this cycle may not behave as expected. I have been open and transparent about that, like what I posted this week, that the probabilities do not favor the 60-year cycle, then other historical analogs come to the surface. When the trend continues, I look for other cycles where price and time may become in balance. I never give a final date, like July 4th as you mentioned. I do not make predictions, forecasts are not predictions. Never believe what I write, always test it. I do not pretend I am always right in my analysis. Past performance is no guarantee for future results. You may continue to follow me or not, that is your choice.
Great analysis as usual!
I do not have your tools and knowledge. But I'm still focused on Jupiter opposing Pluto and the north node beginning late July.
Is the only transit I find that might bring stress. The rest seems rather favourable.
I'm also tracking the 36y cycle. 1990-1991 saw a mild recession.
new uptrend was just started since March. tracking 60yr cycle is meaningless cuz it has been inaccurate for two years. Like you said, the market speaks itself and it is always right. You cant just find the excuses to change the date like 5/10,5/21,7/4 if the top is not formed. You should find a new method instead of a new excuse. What u gotta say if the market keep going up after your final date 7/4? Find another date and reason?this is what u have been done in past two yrs,this is not right. You making a big directional mistake and u don’t wanna revise. People subscribed u because they wanna learn from you,or earn some money based on your predictions.but u keep going wrong for two years without any revision.people can either learn nothing from your wrong method or go bankrupt from your prediction. Things become meaningless. You don’t need to reply cuz I ain’t read your post any more. U need to wake up.dont trap yourself in a same mistake cycle. That mistake cycle is the real cycle for u.
read my latest post on How to make an Annual Forecast using the Gann Method: https://www.fiorente2.com/p/the-annual-forecast-dilemma
David, I do not have a crystal ball, and over the past 5-years I have always been clear, the market may not always follow the 60-year cycle. It is an important cycle, it does not mean the cycle can not contract, extend or invert. I showed you in March in this post: https://fiorente2.substack.com/p/a-revisit-to-recent-charts-and-analysis on the "DJIA -Monthly Chart - The 60-year cycle long-term forecast chart" how this cycle behaved since 2009. It showed a long-term uptrend and then a more sideways move for a decade or more. It has been very accurate in 2022, and other time you see inversions to occur for some time, but the overall trend kept intact for over 16 years. Recently (April 19) in this post: https://fiorente2.substack.com/p/new-highs-and-the-jupiter-saturn I showed you that the Jupiter-Saturn cycle, roughly 1/3 of the 60-year cycle was expected to have a high mid-2026, and I also posted in chart 4 the probabilities of the DJIA aligning with the 6 Jupiter-Saturn cycles over the last 120 years. The only period that shows inversions is between 1966 and 1986, probably caused by retrograde periods of longer-term cycles. So, we may have entered such a period, in which this cycle may not behave as expected. I have been open and transparent about that, like what I posted this week, that the probabilities do not favor the 60-year cycle, then other historical analogs come to the surface. When the trend continues, I look for other cycles where price and time may become in balance. I never give a final date, like July 4th as you mentioned. I do not make predictions, forecasts are not predictions. Never believe what I write, always test it. I do not pretend I am always right in my analysis. Past performance is no guarantee for future results. You may continue to follow me or not, that is your choice.